| View previous topic - View next topic | 
  
  
    | Author | Message | 
  
    | Verious Mage
 
  
 Joined: 06 Jan 2004
 Posts: 409
 Location: Online
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:22 pm    Post subject: Has anyone used REALbasic? | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          | Has anyone used REALbasic before? If so, what version of REALbasic did you use and what was your experience with it (positive, negative, or other)? 
 I'm considering REALbasic 2007 R1 to build the client-side portion of an online RPG I've been working on. The largest motivator to use this language is the platform independence (full Windows, Mac OS X, Mac Classic, and Linux support). The server-side portion is being written in Microsoft C# with a Microsoft SQL backend.
 |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | Ninkazu Demon Hunter
 
  
 Joined: 08 Aug 2002
 Posts: 945
 Location: Location:
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:44 am    Post subject: | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          | You can achieve platform-independence if you use the right libraries in C++. You'll know that what you're creating is minimal and yours. I don't know much about REALbasic other than it's VB cross platform (the virus... it's MUTATED!!). I would assume that it adds a lot of baggage to the executables to be able to run, as QuickBASIC had to add all its libraries to the exe. 
 I would say it's good for RAD like VB and Delphi are, just to have some GUI utilities around the office, but I wouldn't even consider using basic to write an MMO.
 
 I'm not an expert on the topic of garbage collection and it's downfalls, but I remember reading specifically that it's bad for a server application. Just some points to mull over from my opinion. I'm sure Leo is going to want to rip me to shreds though.
 |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | LeoDraco Demon Hunter
 
  
 Joined: 24 Jun 2003
 Posts: 584
 Location: Riverside, South Cali
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:22 am    Post subject: | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          |  	  | Ninkazu wrote: |  	  | I'm sure Leo is going to want to rip me to shreds though. | 
 You syphilitic, Siberian, son-of-a....
 
 Nah, I got nothing.
 _________________
 "...LeoDraco is a pompus git..." -- Mandrake
 |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | Nodtveidt Demon Hunter
 
  
 Joined: 11 Nov 2002
 Posts: 786
 Location: Camuy, PR
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:38 am    Post subject: | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          | Holy shit, that's one expensive compiler. I think only VB costs more than that. _________________
 If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
 |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | Verious Mage
 
  
 Joined: 06 Jan 2004
 Posts: 409
 Location: Online
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:36 pm    Post subject: | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          | With regard to the server-side application I am working on; Microsoft has provided a great deal of control over the garbage collection process in most .Net languages. Furthermore, nearly all high-performance server applications pre-allocate resources and retain them for the execution life of the program to avoid incurring a performance penalty from the resource creation/allocation/destruction process. 
 Most of the informal testing I have performed places C# in nearly the same performance category as C++, with some functions/routines performing slower and some performing faster.
 |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  | 
  
    | BadMrBox Bringer of Apocalypse
 
  
 Joined: 26 Jun 2002
 Posts: 1022
 Location: Dark Forest's of Sweden
 
 | 
        
          |  Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: | [quote] |  
          | 
 |  
          | Holy cow. The prices. The cost. Now I'm going to have nightmares for like, forever. _________________
 
   |  | 
  
    | Back to top |  | 
  
    |  |