[LeoDraco]

[Nephilim]

[tcaudilllg]

Well... "Judging" is the process of reaching conclusions. Perceiving is the process of beginning new things. When you have the two, you have a usable product.

My process of conceptualization is the reverse of yours. I tend to see the "big picture" first, and only all at once does the link between the "big picture" and a concrete advance in understanding occur, when I see how different parts of the big picture interconnect with each other, and exchange information. That makes me a "judge", because I get the result after my unconscious self does the rigor for me. If you want to know more about how I think, hit that link in my sig.

Come to think of it, let's compare "knowledge" and "wisdom". Judges want knowledge; perceivers want "wisdom". But what is knowledge to you, is wisdom to me. Like fire and water, earth and sky, negative and positive, energy and matter. Yes, energy and matter are perfect characterizations. You are energy, I am matter.

[LeoDraco]

[tcaudilllg]

If the model conforms with experiment, is is correct in that case. The challenge is matching the model with the conditions.

From rigor you get the model. From experience you get the conditions.

Which definition of rigor? There are several listed on Wikipedia. Should I presume you meant the first two? (intellectual rigor, intellectual honesty)

Nevermind, I need to find a new place to live. My lease ends tonight. :P

[janus]

[tcaudilllg]

[janus]

[tcaudilllg]

No big deal or anything, but I intuited today that the theory of probability is dual with the General Relativity theory. More later, maybe.

[Mandrake]

I intuited today that your mother is a whore.
_________________
"Well, last time I flicked on a lighter, I'm pretty sure I didn't create a black hole."-
Xmark

http://pauljessup.com

[biggerUniverse]

LordGalby has the ability to do at least one thing: start and maintain very long threads.
_________________
We are on the outer reaches of someone else's universe.

[Happy]

I just intuited that I have just drunk too much alcohol for someone of my body weight.

I was eating ice cream. It was chocolate chip and mint. And I was sipping some Vodka. This is a delicious combination for consumption. I do recommend.

I was giddy with inebriation, and decided to strike up a conversation.

"I'm drinking Vodka and eating mint chocolate chip ice cream." I said to some random person on my buddy list. "That's code for 'Hello, asscunt.'"

"Okay." The person replied. "God, that sounds good actually."

"I'm glad we have that all cleared up. Wait -- the ice cream and vodka or the asscunt?"

"Both really."

"Heh, okay. I don't know who the fuck you are. What the fuck?"

"You're Happy, right?"

"Right." I said, and then wondered how he could've known. I looked at his screen name and there was 'guilt' in it.

"WAIT. SKYWISE?" I exclaimed, "ISAAC COHEN? AM I, AM I, AM I RIGHT?"

"Yesh."

"HAHAHA IT WAS THE GUILT, THE GUILT TOLDED ME." I was happy with this new development. "When did I add you to my buddy list? How long has it been? There are a lot of people on here that I never talk to, I loose track. I forget. These things happen. I apologize."

"It's okay."

"You don't talk much. You're depressingly unresponsive. Why? You're not masturbating or anything are? Are you? Silly vodka. It's messing up my typing."

"I'm reading about rashes."

"Oh. Is it interesting? These rashes."

"Not really."

"That's too bad. I watched A Clockwork Orange a day or so ago. What are your thoughts on that matter?"

"Read the book."

"That's it? That's all you have to say?"

"Yes."

That fucking bastard, I thought, I need more vodka.

[XMark]

I just had a breakthrough!

If you were to further study the intrinsic spacial attributes of a trilinear splurge buffer, you would realize that it is in fact dimensionally reticulated. In other words, the isometric delimiting factors of the recursive astral plateau would in fact cancel out the latent coagulation which you would normally expect in that situation.

Of course, this isn't taking into account the random perturbations in the tertiary plasmic flow, but as can be demonstrated by the formula X=E^(fl)/2 + gh it doesn't make a significant difference in the periodic biomass dispersal wave. (assuming h remains constant)

The solution to this conundrum is simple: since the number of anti-protons which can simultaneously fellate a quark far outweighs the plasmic destabilizing factor, it is quite safe to introduce concurrent phase distortions. In fact, the reaction will create enough energy to allow for a fractal cryonic impulse!
_________________
Mark Hall
Abstract Productions
I PLAYS THE MUSIC THAT MAKES THE PEOPLES FALL DOWN!

[Mandrake]

Skywise? No shit. That takes me back.

[tcaudilllg]