RPGDXThe center of Indie-RPG gaming
Not logged in. [log in] [register]
 
Tell me you did not just take GDR down
 
Post new topic This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next 
View previous topic - View next topic  
Author Message
Nephilim
Mage


Joined: 20 Jun 2002
Posts: 414

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 12:04 am    Post subject: [quote]

RuneLancer wrote:
And personal, because it's not technically illegal nor immoral (what with it being simulated and with nobody "real" involved in it)...


Actually, that has nothing to do with it. Whether or not anybody "real" was involved is not a consideration in the determination of whether a particular bit of material is child pornography, or whether it rises to the level of obscenity in a locality. If you trade in it or produce it, whether it's real or not, you're still going to prison. (This is American law I'm talking about here - not sure about in other countries.)
_________________
Visit the Sacraments web site to play the game and read articles about its development.
Back to top  
LeoDraco
Demon Hunter


Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 584
Location: Riverside, South Cali

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:25 am    Post subject: [quote]

As the last time I was at GDR was shortly after writing that little rant there, I was, obviously, shocked when I attempted to access it a few minutes ago to find Mandrake's little message. For what it is worth, if, by posting the message that I did, I had in any way contributed to the apparent escalating of that thread, I offer my most humble apologies. While Mandrake's action seems to be slightly extreme, I completely understand his reasoning for doing so.

Fascinatingly enough, after reading through the thread, and responding, I decided to look into the original poster's site, more or less to get a feel for him. Assuming the age information is accurate (which, by the content of the site, seems to be the case), I cannot say that I am surprised at his particular interests.

But yeah: I would prefer GDR doesn't die (and cheers to the other admins --- as well as Mandrake, of course --- for taking the steps to reresurrect it after this); I have found the place more stimulating recently than RPGDX.

That, and I'm already going into design challenge withdrawl...
_________________
"...LeoDraco is a pompus git..." -- Mandrake
Back to top  
Nodtveidt
Demon Hunter


Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 786
Location: Camuy, PR

PostPosted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 5:10 pm    Post subject: [quote]

It was Mandrake's property, so it was his decision. He has his reasons, and there are indeed legitimate and very valid. Although I don't think, mandrake, you are really suited to make the kind of judgement call you did on the whole "it doesn't work that way" (because frankly, it does), you were wise to remove the thread.
_________________
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
Back to top  
Mandrake
elementry school minded asshole


Joined: 28 May 2002
Posts: 1341
Location: GNARR!

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:10 am    Post subject: [quote]

Actually, since I host the site, I am the only person suited in making that judement call.
_________________
"Well, last time I flicked on a lighter, I'm pretty sure I didn't create a black hole."-
Xmark

http://pauljessup.com
Back to top  
Nodtveidt
Demon Hunter


Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 786
Location: Camuy, PR

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:30 am    Post subject: [quote]

Mandrake wrote:
Actually, since I host the site, I am the only person suited in making that judement call.

The issue of "it doesn't work that way" has nothing to do with whether you host the site or not. Me owning a site doesn't make me entitled to speak on the inductance value of an iron-core transformer with 16 winds. Why? Because I don't know anything about the subject, just as you don't know anything about the subject you spoke on. :P The fact that you own the site does allow you to decide what is or is not posted there, but it doesn't automatically net you knowledge on the details of things posted there...that's my point. :)
_________________
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
Back to top  
tcaudilllg
Dragonmaster


Joined: 20 Jun 2002
Posts: 1731
Location: Cedar Bluff, VA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:34 am    Post subject: [quote]

Would someone PM me the text of this thread? I mean, surely the response by the players has scientific value. I promise I'll keep it to myself.

It's not every day that perfectly normal people are presented with such an odd suggestion... let alone a taboo one.

You can leave the links out, I just want the text.
Back to top  
Nodtveidt
Demon Hunter


Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 786
Location: Camuy, PR

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:16 am    Post subject: [quote]

I would but I don't have it. As I said before, Mandrake was wise to remove it.
_________________
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
Back to top  
RuneLancer
Mage


Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:19 am    Post subject: [quote]

You could just post a thread about your very own pedophilic game, LG, and see how people here react. I'm sure it'd be very enlightening. :P

I take no responsabilities in anyone being banned or alienated from the community over this, should you go through with it...
_________________
Endless Saga
An OpenGL RPG in the making. Now with new hosting!

Back to top  
Nodtveidt
Demon Hunter


Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 786
Location: Camuy, PR

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:41 am    Post subject: [quote]

By the way...I find the whole thing to be extremely hypocritical. I see some are saying "a pedophaelic game will turn people into pedophiles or justify the action!". Hello people...are we forgetting something here? How about the huge stink people raised over the actual outcome of games like GTA:SA? Or reaching back into history...games like AD&D or Mortal Kombat? Did these games do what all the knuckleheads said they did (such as turned children into Satanists or caused people to kill each other)? Of course not! So why are some of you raising a stink from the opposite side of the fence? Are we all not some of the same people who thought Jack Thompson was a clueless piece of shit who had no idea what the fuck he was talking about?

While I don't really think that the game is a good idea for legal reasons, I personally see no real moral objections to the game, for the very same reason that I see no moral objections to GTA:SA, MK, or AD&D...they're just games. I have a daughter of my own, and when she is old enough to understand, she will be educated on the many evils that some people do, and pedophiles will be near the top of the list.

I write games that include genocide, rape, torture, war, destruction of other people's property, homosexuality, alcohol, deceit, revenge, hatred, misery, and all kinds of other things that are often looked at as "bad" (many of which actually are). But does that mean I condone them? Of course not...they're just games. (Don't get me wrong though...I've got nothing against homosexuality.)

Education is the key to prevention, not ignorance or censorship. And while we can sit around and point the finger at all the "bad people" all day long, that doesn't change their actions or intentions...people will do what they want regardless of what you do or say, whether they know it's hurting someone else or not, and whether it's legal or not. So whining about it isn't gonna accomplish jack shit...you have to take a proactive stance in your own life against what is wrong, you have to defend yourself.

As I said though...mandrake, it was on your forum, under your ownership, you had every right to remove it, as the place was your rules, your time, and your money. Anyone who disagrees with this key factor is an idiot.

EDIT: And I can guarantee at least one person is going to do one of two things here: (1) completely misinterpret what I've said, or (2) conveniently take things out of context and try to use them as an argument against me. It's not gonna work...don't bother.
_________________
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
Back to top  
RuneLancer
Mage


Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:21 am    Post subject: [quote]

I don't think you're justified in talking about this sort of thing, nodtveidt. And I quote...

nodtveidt wrote:
By the way... I [...] justify the [...] games like AD&D or Mortal Kombat. [...] They [...] turned children into Satanists. [...] I personally see no real moral objections to [...] pedophiles. [...] I condone them. [...] I've got nothing against [...] hurting [...] mandrake [...] for[...] money.

Anyone who disagrees [...] is an idiot.


Tsk tsk...

(Just kidding. Grain of salt, yo. ;) I know you don't condone pedophiles. The bit about Mandrake, on the other hand... ...kidding again. :)

I agree that there's a bit of a double standard at work here, however there's a difference in having a game turn someone into something and having a game encourage a socially inacceptable behavior someone is already interested in to begin with. I don't get my jollies by killing cops and secretly want to blow up the police station 3 blocks away, but if I were a pedophile with one hand on my controller and the other on the joystick (ahem), that's different. In that it's a very real fantasy I have outside the game as much as while playing it.

Of course, you could argue it's better for them to get their fix through a harmless game than chasing down kids with promises of candy in their van.
_________________
Endless Saga
An OpenGL RPG in the making. Now with new hosting!

Back to top  
Nodtveidt
Demon Hunter


Joined: 11 Nov 2002
Posts: 786
Location: Camuy, PR

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 2:42 am    Post subject: [quote]

RuneLancer wrote:
Of course, you could argue it's better for them to get their fix through a harmless game than chasing down kids with promises of candy in their van.

That was basically my point, and also the point of the guy who came up with the fucked up idea in the first place. And nice way to take what I said out of context...it just dont get any better than that... :D
_________________
If you play a Microsoft CD backwards you can hear demonic voices. The scary part is that if you play it forwards it installs Windows. - wallace
Back to top  
Nephilim
Mage


Joined: 20 Jun 2002
Posts: 414

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 7:54 am    Post subject: [quote]

nodtveidt wrote:
By the way...I find the whole thing to be extremely hypocritical. I see some are saying "a pedophaelic game will turn people into pedophiles or justify the action!"


Who exactly has said that?

No one in this forum, that I can see, is saying that a video game can turn someone into a pedophile, and I don't recall that on the GDR thread, either, although I didn't read all of it before it was taken down. I'm not sure where exactly you're getting that from.

But regardless, I don't think it's hypocritical to reject a game that has pedophilia as its primary gameplay element while accepting Grand Theft Auto, any more than it is hypocritical to reject videos containing child pornography while accepting, say, the lobby scene in The Matrix. Just because it's a game doesn't mean that it can't rise to the level of obscenity.

Games are content, just like video and print - that's why rating systems emerged, and why parents need to make decisions about what games their kids play. All content - games, movies, print - has an entire spectrum of appropriateness, and when that content rises to the level of obscenity, that's when it triggers legal action, and for many people, goes over the line morally.

But nutjobs like Jack Thompson don't view things that way. They don't view games simply as content. They view games as some sort of brainwashing which "installs" that content into the player (think "nation of killers!!!"). They don't view games as individual works, but as a collective evil. They don't want the same level of artistic and topical freedom to apply to games that are granted to movies and print. They don't take a measured approach, but instead want to legislate the entire medium out of existence.

There's a gulf of difference between these approaches. Just because Jack Thompson would attack a particular game, that doesn't mean we, as gamers, need to defend it. Some content, like child pornography, is indefensible to the conscientious, responsible person, and if someone chooses to put that content into a game, it is not hypocritical to reject that game.

(And let's be clear: the likes of Jack Thompson would use the mere existence of a pedophilia game as an indictment for the entire games industry, rather than allowing it to be the ill-conceived idea of an individual - that's the sort of difference in approach I'm talking about here.)

I personally think that the content in GTA does not rise to the level of obscenity. It's full of impersonal realistic violence, yeah, but it's not obscene. In fact, I think it could get a good bit more violent and still not be obscene. A game that had enough relevant content to allow pedophiles to enact their fantasies virtually, on the other hand, would be obscene in my book. Drawing a distinction between the two sets of content doesn't make me a hypocrite, nor does it put me in the same camp as people like Thompson. That just means I have an opinion about what constitutes obscenity.
_________________
Visit the Sacraments web site to play the game and read articles about its development.
Back to top  
white_door
Icemonkey


Joined: 30 May 2002
Posts: 243
Location: New Zealand

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 8:46 am    Post subject: [quote]

Lets not get drawn into the arguement of if playing a game either leds to actions protrayed in those games. Some would agree that they don't, some would disagree. Whatever.

This is a different matter. At some point you have to decide on the acceptablity of a game's content. And provided no laws are broken, the author is the only one who has a right to decide what is acceptable in their game. However, when they advertise or show material from the game on someone's site.. it then also comes down to the runner of the site to decide if that content is acceptable for their site.

I personally I don't understand this bizarre belief that people have when posting on an internet forums. For some reason they think they have some right to Free Speech or something. You have the right to free speech on your own site. When you are on someone else's site, that right belongs to them.

Looking at it from a purely objective point of view, if mandrake felt the content of the post was unacceptable he should have the right to remove it without question or without having to prove his case.

Personally I was so sickened by that post, and if I was seriously considering leaving indie programming community perminately if nothing was done about it. I'm glad someone had the backbone to stand up for what they believe in. That post just went too far, way past any sort of sane level of torrence.
Back to top  
RuneLancer
Mage


Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Posts: 441

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:18 am    Post subject: [quote]

Don't let one bad apple spoil the rest of the pie for you, white_door. :P There's always going to be some immature/immoral/imwhatever person in every field you stumble on that'll be there to ruin things for others, wether they realise it or not. Often, they don't, or they know they're crossing a line others will object to them crossing, but do so anyways and hope for the best.

If anything, you should see it as a reason to work on better projects. For the sake of balancing out the crap they drag into the community. ;)
_________________
Endless Saga
An OpenGL RPG in the making. Now with new hosting!

Back to top  
NyanNyanKoneko
Wandering Minstrel


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 98

PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:36 pm    Post subject: [quote]

OK, I was the last person to post in that thread, so here's what happened.

Leo posted something where he said that the idea was bad.

I backed up Leo.

We both said stuff along the lines that it'll attract both Pedophiles and immature children to the site.

Anyways...

Rew started to flip out and wrote a very long 30- 60+ line paragraph rant about how offended everyone else is and that he hates their attitudes and they should leave the thread if they are offended.

I tried to calm him down by saying we just didn't like the idea, but we weren't offended.

But by the time I wrote that, he had wrote another reply in which he was clearly just trying to troll by saying how he hates women, blah blah...

Anyways, Then he posted again trying to get into a fight with me. But, like I said, he was clearly trying to troll. So I ignored him.

So the final posts were...

Leo - Your idea is juvinile.
Me - Your idea could be dangerous
Rew - Long paragaph rant about how if people are offended they should leave.
Rew - Another long paragraph rant about how he hates women.
Me - Trying to calm Rew down, but was posted after his second post because he wrote it while I was writing this post.
Rew - Thinking he got bait, tried to start a fight with another rant.
Sirocco - Now that we got in touch with our feelings... lock.

Anyways, Rew was just trolling. Beyond his obvious troll behavior, I went to his forum, and he had links to all the forums where people got offended at his idea, and how happy he was. GDR was listed before it got shut down.
Back to top  
Post new topic This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Page 2 of 5 All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next 



Display posts from previous:   
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum